User talk:Wussbeschdilar77933

For all tennis supporters, the US Masters in early April is without doubt one of the shows of the golf schedule. For if you prefer to guess profitably on the event golf bettors, its also a bet opportunity and an in depth study of past and present form is critical. Just what exactly will be the most important golf numbers for selecting the USA Masters winner?

1 -- Since 1990, more than 80% of US Masters winners have won or completed 2nd atleast once already that year.

In that time, only Jose Maria Olazabal in 1999, Nick Faldo in 1990 and Ben Crenshaw in 1995 did not finish top 2 or better on either the US PGA or European tour in the year the tournament was won by them.

Apparently all three people had previously won the Masters in a previous year but -- in 1994, 1984 and 1989 respectively.

2 -- This season, a lot more than ever, Augusta will prefer the big hitters. That is as the class has been extended an additional 155 yards to 7445 yards with modifications to six holes. Augusta has now been extended over 400 yards in the last 5 years. The course plays long so unless there is a whole lot or rain to eliminate the big hitters benefit, favour those golfers who rank well for driving distance.

3 -- The other extremely important stat is the Greens-In-Regulation (GIR) percent. GIR only measures how often a golfer reaches the green in the regulation amount of strokes (or less). For instance, on a 4 hole, Regulation would be to make the green in two strokes. On a par 5, three strokes. To demonstrate just how crucial this information is, only one time in the last six years has the Masters champion NOT placed in the first two for GIR portion at the competitions finish.

4 -- The Masters is a competition for proven winners. Large name people such as Padraig Harrington, Phil Mickelson, and Vijay Singh have huge documents in this function. Mickelson for example has completed no worse than 12th within the last 8 years! Unlike the British Open, shock long possibilities winners are extremely rare. No golfer playing the Masters for initially has won the match since Fuzzy Zoeller in 1979, so previous Masters form is a must.

Armed with the aforementioned ideas, it must be possible to get rid of a sizable percentage of the 2006 US Masters area as possible winners. The golfer will probably have good past Masters sort, have won or finished 2nd in a competition atleast once already that year, and rank highly in the driving range and GIR stats for his respective tour [ fs24 cf2 http://www.chauff'f8r-jobbet.dk/ image] fs34 cf2 .}