User talk:Grescarmawit42277

On July 5, 2005 I published an article entitled "7 Top Approaches to Steer clear of Link Theft" which was picked up and integrated as content material on other web sites.

Ahead of the write-up was released I checked on Google regardless of whether any outcomes already existed for the exact phrase "7 Top rated Techniques to Avoid Link Theft" and there had been no listings for that ter...

If you do not think Google's Duplicate Content Filter exists, I have Dramatic Proof their Web content material filter exists and it is quite successful.

On July five, 2005 I published an article entitled "7 Best Methods to Keep away from Link Theft" which was picked up and integrated as content on other websites.

Just before the post was released I checked on Google regardless of whether any outcomes currently existed for the precise phrase "7 Top Methods to Keep away from Link Theft" and there were no listings for that phrase.

Over the subsequent couple of weeks I monitored through a search query on Google how numerous benefits appeared in Google for the title of my report. A single week after publication there had been 6,760 benefits listed in Google, a week later it was 14,100 and it reached a peak of 17,000 benefits by July 26, 2005.

four weeks right after publication the final results in Google had fallen slightly to 16,600.

Nearly 6 weeks right after publication the final results listed in Google had fallen to 44.

In a matter of much less than two weeks the quantity of search benefits on Google.com for the title of my report had gone from 16,600 to just 44.

In case you are thinking this is because all these other internet sites dropped by article and replaced it with other content I really should add that a search on Yahoo.com on the identical day nonetheless showed 14,300 final results for my report.

What's far more of these 44 final results on Google, more than half consist of listings from the exact same web sites. In other words some internet sites have the exact same post duplicated on distinct pages on their internet site.

So Google's Internet Content material Filter is not utilized to remove duplicate listings from the preferred websites it chooses to maintain in the search benefits.

On August 28th, 2005 8 weeks following first publication I distributed the write-up once again to a new list of report web sites to repeat the process. After 6 weeks the very same write-up had reached a peak of 5,620 benefits on Google. Less toner than two weeks later the outcomes had fallen to 217.

For me this was dramatic proof that Google's Duplicate Net Content material Filter is active and extremely effective. If you are wondering if other major search engines have a duplicate content material filter I can confirm that Yahoo definitely does. The identical article which was as soon as listed on 14,300 websites on Yahoo, has fallen to 344 over the same time period.

From these results it would appear Google takes about 6 to 8 weeks to get rid of duplicate content material employing its Duplicate World wide web Content Filter.

But the question remaining is just how does Google determine which out of more than 16,000 benefits does it keep and which does it reject?

I have witnessed scenarios exactly where my own articles seem in benefits on other websites, but are not listed in the results for my own site.

So obviously Google does not take into account who the originator and author of the original post was when deciding which internet sites will stay in its search final results.

It also seems to have absolutely nothing to do with exactly where Google 1st finds the report.

Some articles I have published to my web site for several weeks before releasing them for distribution to other internet sites.

In that time the Google spiders have visited my web site several occasions and Google has had adequate time to work out that the report was very first found on my site.

It would be fascinating to see if it is achievable to operate out what variables Google is utilizing in its Web Content material Filter to make a decision which benefits to maintain in its listing and which ones to eliminate. But that is for another report.